A physician retained us to respond to a proposed removal for failure to follow procedures, absence without leave, and delaying patient care. The written response and oral reply explained that the charges were based on a misunderstanding and that the proposed penalty was unreasonable. We also argued that client’s prior discipline did not justify a harsher penalty for the current charges. Based on our response, the agency rescinded the proposed removal.
Hello, you are using an old browser that's unsafe and no longer supported. Please consider updating your browser to a newer version, or downloading a modern browser.
