Our client received a proposed removal for unacceptable performance after allegedly failing to complete a performance improvement plan (PIP). We submitted a response to the proposal. In our response, we argued that the agency held our client to an unreasonably high performance standard and that our client had, in fact, met the PIP requirements. Based on our arguments, the deciding official rescinded the proposal and held that our client did perform at an acceptable level during the PIP.
Hello, you are using an old browser that's unsafe and no longer supported. Please consider updating your browser to a newer version, or downloading a modern browser.
