The Government Accountability Project might be busier now than ever before. The organization backs whistleblowers. In recent days, it has dealt with an influx of concerns and questions brought to them by federal workers facing the Trump administration. Take acting Attorney General Sally Yates’ firing as a prime example of the bad that can happen for refusing to follow executive orders.
Yates had ordered the DOJ not to defend Trump’s immigration ban. Trump fired Yates that same night. As Politico reports – and as you’d expect – the largest group of federal workers who’ve called the Government Accountability Project are those who “want to know what to do if they’re asked to violate the law.”
On that note, we turn our attention to the Environmental Protection Agency.
Trump’s nominee is a ‘leading advocate against the EPA’s activist agenda’
A Bloomberg article raises the possibility that lawmakers could decide to eliminate the Environmental Protection Agency, although the authors acknowledge that doing so – even in the Trump era – is easier said than done, owing to decades of regulations that stand in the way. In all likelihood, Trump and lawmakers will opt for a more straightforward route toward their goal of less environmental regulation.
On this route, Trump has an ally in Scott Pruitt.
Pruitt is Trump’s nominee to head up the agency. Though not yet confirmed, Pruitt would reportedly assist in “undoing” Obama’s environmental regulations. He’d also presumably pave the way for more coal plants. Pruitt’s background as Attorney General of Oklahoma and “leading advocate against the EPA’s activist agenda,” as per an archived version of his official website, would make him the man for the job.
To make a long story short
It’s not hard to imagine EPA employees in a bind, caught between carrying out the agency’s mission of environmental protection and following the new boss’s orders (and suffering the workplace retaliation that could come from refusing to do so). The EPA, in other words, could become ground zero for federal workers in other agencies nationwide who may soon face new bosses barking unreasonable – perhaps unlawful – demands.